Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Christie Acosta
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Christie Acosta
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1808
SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHRISTIE MICHELLE ACOSTA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael Jason Dunn,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
GS THADIUS LLC, d/b/a The Bar; NEM INC., d/b/a Sandy Monkey; WILLIAM J. MUSE; SHARON CUMBIE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. A. Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr., District Judge. (4:18-cv-00099-MGL)
Submitted: January 23, 2020 Decided: February 5, 2020
Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William S. Duncan, LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM STUART DUNCAN, PA, Georgetown, South Carolina, for Appellant. Robert M. Kennedy, Jr., PHELPS DUNBAR, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
The estate of Michael J. Dunn appeals the district court’s order granting summary
judgment to Scottsdale Insurance Company on its complaint seeking a declatory judgment
that it had no duty to defend an action against its insured based on assault and battery
exclusions to the policies’ liquor liability coverage. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Acosta, No. 4:18-cv-00099-MGL (D.S.C. July 2, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished