Elisabeth Paige v. Gabriel Brothers
Elisabeth Paige v. Gabriel Brothers
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1599
ELISABETH F. PAIGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GABRIEL BROTHERS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00742-REP)
Submitted: November 26, 2019 Decided: February 12, 2020
Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elisabeth F. Paige, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Elisabeth F. Paige appeals the district court’s order denying her application to proceed in forma pauperis and closing her case. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Paige’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.