United States v. Ricky Frink
United States v. Ricky Frink
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6960
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICKY LAMONT FRINK, a/k/a Pretty Ricky, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00022-RBS-JEB- 1)
Submitted: January 31, 2020 Decided: February 13, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Lamont Frink, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ricky Lamont Frink appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(B) (2018) motion. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons given by the district court in exercising its discretion. United States v. Frink, No. 4:06-cr- 00022-RBS-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. June 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.