United States v. Gregory Ziglar

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gregory Ziglar

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-4503

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GREGORY J. ZIGLAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (4:19-cr-00030-HCM- DEM-1)

Submitted: February 20, 2020 Decided: February 24, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory J. Ziglar, Appellant Pro Se. Brian James Samuels, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory J. Ziglar seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for

self-representation and appointing new trial counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction

only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The order that Ziglar seeks to appeal is neither a final

order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny Ziglar’s pending motions. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished