Shapat Nabaya v. IRS
Shapat Nabaya v. IRS
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-2225
SHAPAT AHDAWAN NABAYA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 7207-19)
Submitted: February 20, 2020 Decided: February 24, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, RUSHING, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joel Branman, Joan Iris Oppenheimer, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya appeals the tax court’s order dismissing his petition for
lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the tax court. Nabaya v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 7207-19 (T.C.
Sept. 19, 2019). We also deny Nabaya’s motions to compel a response, to expedite, for
summary judgment, and for return of his pension. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished