U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2020

Jennifer Iraheta Franco v. William Barr

Jennifer Iraheta Franco v. William Barr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 4, 2020

Jennifer Iraheta Franco v. William Barr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1575

JENNIFER MARITZA IRAHETA FRANCO, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: February 20, 2020 Decided: March 4, 2020

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdoul A. Konare, KONARE LAW, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellant. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Anthony P. Nicastro, Assistant Director, S. Nicole Nardone, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jennifer Maritza Iraheta Franco, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals summarily affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed Franco’s claims, the administrative record, and the final administrative order of removal, and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2018), and that substantial evidence supports the agency’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the agency.

See In re Franco (B.I.A. Apr. 30, 2019). We deny the Attorney General’s motion for summary disposition as moot and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.