John Venizelos v. Jennifer Saad
John Venizelos v. Jennifer Saad
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7207
JOHN VENIZELOS, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JENNIFER SAAD, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00119-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: March 10, 2020 Decided: March 13, 2020
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Venizelos, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John Venizelos appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for fees and costs and for reconsideration following the dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and found no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.