Michael Taylor v. Stubbs Perdue Attorneys at Law
Michael Taylor v. Stubbs Perdue Attorneys at Law
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-19785
MICHAEL TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STUBBS PERDUE, ATTORNEYS AT LAW; CHRISTOPHER VENTERS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-ct-03132-D)
Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 16, 2020
Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Anthony Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Ashley Burgess Bartolucci, HALL BOOTH SMITH, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Taylor appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motion to enforce a settlement agreement, denying as moot Taylor’s motion for entry of default judgment, and denying Taylor’s motions for reconsideration and to reopen the case.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Taylor v. Stubbs Perdue, Attorneys At Law, No. 5:18-ct-03132-D (E.D.N.C. July 15, 2019 and Dec. 3, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.