Stephen Herto v. John Murphy
Stephen Herto v. John Murphy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7752
STEPHEN D. HERTO, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JOHN T. MURPHY, Acting Warden, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:17-cv-00054-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 17, 2020
Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen D. Herto, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Stephen D. Herto seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) petition and giving him an opportunity to abandon the claims the district court found unexhausted or to stay the action pending exhaustion in state court. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Herto seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and deny Herto’s motion to stay district court proceedings pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.