Lynton Ballentine v. Wells Fargo Bank National
Lynton Ballentine v. Wells Fargo Bank National
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-2117
LYNTON BALLENTINE; LB INTERNATIONAL EXPRESS TRUST, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; GINNIE MAE, As Trustee for Securitized Trust Guaranteed Remic Pass-Through Securities 2006-040 Trust; CHAMPION MORTGAGE COMPANY; SHAPIRO AND INGLE, LLP; SATTERFIELD LEGAL, PLLC; DOES 1 THROUGH 100, Inclusive; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00589-CCE-JEP)
Submitted: March 19, 2020 Decided: March 30, 2020
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lynton Ballentine, Appellant Pro Se. B. Chad Ewing, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP; Jason Kenneth Purser, SHAPIRO & INGLE LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s order denying their motion to amend.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2018); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because the claims are still pending against certain Defendants, the order Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.