United States v. Todarian Martin
United States v. Todarian Martin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6342
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TODARIAN DONDRELL MARTIN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:16-cr-00335-WO-1; 1:19-cv- 01087-WO-LPA)
Submitted: June 18, 2020 Decided: June 23, 2020
Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todarian Dondrell Martin, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Todarian Dondrell Martin seeks to appeal from the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that Martin’s letter be filed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2018) motion and dismissed as successive and unauthorized. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2018), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The report and recommendation Martin seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.