John Alexander v. Bryan Stirling
John Alexander v. Bryan Stirling
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6248
JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRYAN STIRLING, Director Individual and Official Capacities; B. MCGEE, Responsible Authority Individual and Official Capacities; CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden Individual and Official Capacities; KURT STEVENS, Agent Individual and Official Capacities; M. BARKER, Disciplinary Hearing Officer Individual and Official Capacities; THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MR. ROGERS, In his Individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:19-cv-00215-HMH)
Submitted: July 7, 2020 Decided: July 29, 2020
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Douglas Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John Douglas Alexander appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Alexander’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alexander v. Stirling, 6:19-cv-00215-HMH (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.