Franklin Smith v. Peter Mantoni
Franklin Smith v. Peter Mantoni
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6269
FRANKLIN C. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PETER J. MANTONI, Master Officer, Defendant - Appellee, and OFFICER HANEBRINK, a/k/a Officer Provo; UNKNOWN, Training Officer; CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (2:16-cv-00495-MSD-DEM)
Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decided: July 28, 2020
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Franklin C. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Franklin C. Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Mantoni, No. 2:16-cv-00495-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2020). Smith’s motion to compel is denied.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.