U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2020

William Satterfield v. Gilmore Hicks

William Satterfield v. Gilmore Hicks
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 23, 2020

William Satterfield v. Gilmore Hicks

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7894

WILLIAM SATTERFIELD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GILMORE HICKS; APRIL GREEN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00170-JAG-RCY)

Submitted: July 21, 2020 Decided: July 23, 2020

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Satterfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: William Satterfield appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2018). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Satterfield v. Hicks, No. 3:19-cv-00170-JAG-RCY (E.D. Va. Nov. 25, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court dismissed Satterfield’s claims without prejudice, we have jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 605, 615 (4th Cir. 2020).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.