U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2020

Jermaine Tart v. Jamese Vigus

Jermaine Tart v. Jamese Vigus
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 2, 2020

Jermaine Tart v. Jamese Vigus

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6397

JERMAINE ANTWAN TART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMESE VIGUS; MARK TROCK, Defendants - Appellees, and JOHN DOES; TABOR CITY MAILROOM STAFF, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03207-D)

Submitted: August 21, 2020 Decided: September 2, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermaine Antwan Tart, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jermaine Antwan Tart appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tart v. Vigus, No. 5:17- ct-03207-D (E.D.N.C. May 29, 2018, & Mar. 2, 2020). We grant Tart’s motion to supplement his informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.