In Re: Ernest Ingram
In Re: Ernest Ingram
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1424
In re: ERNEST INGRAM, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:15-cr-00392-GJH-3)
Submitted: August 25, 2020 Decided: August 27, 2020
Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest Ingram, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Ernest Ingram petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has denied Ingram’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Ingram’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.