U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2020

Betty Hill v. Southeastern Regional Medical

Betty Hill v. Southeastern Regional Medical
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 26, 2020

Betty Hill v. Southeastern Regional Medical

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1073

BETTY JO HILL, the children, brothers, sisters of the late Carl Wayne Locklear, Plaintiff - Appellant, and CAROL LOCKLEAR; CHARLOTTE LOCKLEAR; ANGELI BUE LOCKLEAR; ERIC LOCKLEAR; CLAUDIE LOCKLEAR; ROSE MARIE LOCKLEAR; PAUL WAYNE LOCKLEAR, Plaintiffs, v. SOUTHEASTERN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER; DR. CHARLES AZUBUIKE ANENE; DR. WILLIAM R. HERZOG, JR.; DR. TERRY S. LOWRY; TAMMY LOCKLEAR, Nurse; CAROLINA REHAB CENTER OF CUMBERLAND; CAPE FEAR VALLEY HOSPITAL; DR. SUSHMA MEDI KAYALA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (7:19-cv-00060-BO)

Submitted: July 30, 2020 Decided: August 26, 2020

Before WILKINSON and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty Jo Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Betty Jo Hill appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hill v. Southeastern Reg’l Med. Ctr., No. 7:19-cv-00060-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.