Tyrone Peele v. Jack Williford
Tyrone Peele v. Jack Williford
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6119
TYRONE PEELE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JACK A. WILLIFORD, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00229-D)
Submitted: May 19, 2020 Decided: August 13, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Peele, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Tyrone Peele appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Peele v. Williford, No. 5:19- cv-00229-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.