United States v. Christopher Randall

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Christopher Randall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6044

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER JUNIOR RANDALL, a/k/a Chris,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00583-TLW-1)

Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 24, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Junior Randall, Appellant Pro Se. Everett E. McMillian, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Christopher J. Randall appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion

seeking a sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018,

Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404

,

132 Stat. 5194

, 5222. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Randall,

No. 4:06-cr-00583-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2019). We deny Randall’s motion for the

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished