United States v. John Hargrove
United States v. John Hargrove
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6746
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOHN E. HARGROVE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:07-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1)
Submitted: September 22, 2020 Decided: September 25, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John E. Hargrove, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John E. Hargrove appeals the district court’s order construing Hargrove’s request for the court to provide a cost for copies of all transcripts from his criminal case as a motion for transcripts and denying that relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error or abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hargrove, No. 3:07-cr-00058-GMG-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 8, 2020). We deny Hargrove’s motion to preclude certain BOP officials from handling or processing his legal materials. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.