Joel Garcia-Calderon v. F.C.I. Edgefield Warden

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Joel Garcia-Calderon v. F.C.I. Edgefield Warden

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6232

JOEL GARCIA-CALDERON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

F.C.I. EDGEFIELD WARDEN; RECREATION YARD OFFICERS AND STAFF,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (9:18-cv-02947-TMC)

Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 28, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joel Garcia-Calderon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joel Garcia-Calderon appeals the district court’s order accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Garcia-Calderon’s complaint filed

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Garcia-Calderon v. F.C.I. Edgefield Warden, No. 9:18-cv-02947-TMC (D.S.C.

Jan. 28, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished