Terrance Washington v. Crystal Willett

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Terrance Washington v. Crystal Willett

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6816

TERRANCE LEON WASHINGTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CRYSTAL WILLETT, Superintendent of Meherrin River Regional Jail,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01397-AJT-IDD)

Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 29, 2020

Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrance Leon Washington, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Terrance Leon Washington appeals the district court’s order dismissing without

prejudice his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition for failure to comply with the court’s order to show

cause why his petition should not be dismissed as moot. * On appeal, we confine our review

to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Washington’s

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,

775 F.3d 170, 177

(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules,

our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Because the district court dismissed Washington’s action “for procedural reasons unrelated to the contents of the pleadings,” we have jurisdiction over this appeal. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc.,

807 F.3d 619, 624

(4th Cir. 2015); see Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC,

959 F.3d 605

, 611-12 (4th Cir. 2020) (discussing factors courts consider in determining whether order is final and appealable).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished