Larry Williams v. Scott Lewis
Larry Williams v. Scott Lewis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6813
LARRY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCOTT B. LEWIS; SUSAN M. DUFFY; FELICIA OGUNSILE; ADAM T. BRADBURN; CAPTAIN LANE; OFFICER BUTLER, Unit Counselor; WARDEN GLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (5:19-cv-00182-MGL)
Submitted: September 24, 2020 Decided: September 29, 2020
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Todd Smith, LOGAN, JOLLY & SMITH, LLP, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Larry Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge, dismissing Williams’
42 U.S.C. § 1983claim for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies, and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over
Williams’ remaining state law claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Lewis,
No. 5:19-cv-00182-MGL (D.S.C. May 19, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished