Bilal Al-Haqq v. Francis Johnson
Bilal Al-Haqq v. Francis Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6721
BILAL A. AL-HAQQ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRANCIS JOHNSON, I.G.C.; SGT. FOGLEBACH; MS. TAMMY WAY; EUGENE SKIPPER; FRANCINE BAUGHMAN, O.H.O.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (1:19-cv-00158-DCC)
Submitted: October 22, 2020 Decided: October 27, 2020
Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bilal A. Al-Haqq, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq appeals the district court’s order denying his requests for
sanctions, a default judgment, and appointment of counsel, adopting the recommendations
of the magistrate judge to deny his motion to amend and grant summary judgment to
Defendants, and dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983civil rights action for failure to exhaust
available administrative remedies. Al-Haqq confines his appeal to the district court’s
ruling dismissing the action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Al-Haqq v. Johnson, No. 1:19-cv-00158-DCC (D.S.C. Apr. 15,
2020). We deny Al-Haqq’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished