Uhuru Rowe v. Michael Carpenter

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Uhuru Rowe v. Michael Carpenter

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6256

UHURU ROWE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL CARPENTER; NANCY PERKERSON; TERESA L. BIRCKHEAD; T. DARDEN; GREGORY HALLOWAY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00780-REP)

Submitted: November 2, 2020 Decided: November 19, 2020

Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey E. Fogel, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, Victoria N. Pearson, Deputy Attorney General, Laura Maughan, Assistant Attorney General, Toby J. Heytens, Solicitor General, Michelle S. Kallen, Deputy Solicitor General, Martine E. Cicconi, Deputy Solicitor General, Jessica Merry Samuels, Assistant Solicitor General, Zachary R. Glubiak, John Marshall Fellow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Uhuru Rowe appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to

dismiss and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rowe v.

Carpenter, No. 3:18-cv-00780-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2020). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished