Uhuru Rowe v. Michael Carpenter
Uhuru Rowe v. Michael Carpenter
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6256
UHURU ROWE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL CARPENTER; NANCY PERKERSON; TERESA L. BIRCKHEAD; T. DARDEN; GREGORY HALLOWAY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00780-REP)
Submitted: November 2, 2020 Decided: November 19, 2020
Before WILKINSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey E. Fogel, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, Victoria N. Pearson, Deputy Attorney General, Laura Maughan, Assistant Attorney General, Toby J. Heytens, Solicitor General, Michelle S. Kallen, Deputy Solicitor General, Martine E. Cicconi, Deputy Solicitor General, Jessica Merry Samuels, Assistant Solicitor General, Zachary R. Glubiak, John Marshall Fellow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Uhuru Rowe appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to
dismiss and dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rowe v.
Carpenter, No. 3:18-cv-00780-REP (E.D. Va. Jan. 22, 2020). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished