Shonta Helton v. Patricia Yeldell
Shonta Helton v. Patricia Yeldell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6949
SHONTA HELTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA YELDELL, Warden, Leath Correctional Institution,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (5:19-cv-02789-DCC)
Submitted: October 28, 2020 Decided: November 9, 2020 Amended: November 10, 2020
Before KEENAN, DIAZ, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shonta Helton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Shonta Helton seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely Helton’s
28 U.S.C. § 2254petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler,
565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) (explaining that
§ 2254 petitions are subject to one-year statute of limitations, running from latest of four
commencement dates enumerated in
28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The order is not appealable
unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing
of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district
court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the
dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of
the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez,
565 U.S. at 140-41 (citing Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000)).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Helton has not made
the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished