United States v. Ingram Cox
United States v. Ingram Cox
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-4044
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
INGRAM COX,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:19-cr-00006-RBS-LRL-3)
Submitted: November 19, 2020 Decided: November 23, 2020
Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Melissa J. Warner, LAW OFFICE OF MELISSA J. WARNER, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellant. G. Zachary Terwilliger, United States Attorney, Daniel T. Young, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, Andrew Bosse, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ingram Cox appeals his conviction and 168-month sentence imposed following his
guilty plea to conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, and possess with intent to manufacture
and distribute heroin. On appeal, Cox contends that his plea counsel rendered ineffective
assistance by failing to advise him that he could be held responsible for his coconspirators’
reasonably foreseeable acts. However, “[u]nless an attorney’s ineffectiveness conclusively
appears on the face of the record, such claims are not addressed on direct appeal.” United
States v. Faulls,
821 F.3d 502, 507-08(4th Cir. 2016). Because we discern no such
evidence “on the face of this record, we conclude that [Cox’s] claim should be raised, if at
all, in a
28 U.S.C. § 2255motion.”
Id.Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished