United States v. Anthony Velasquez
United States v. Anthony Velasquez
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6801
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY PAUL VELASQUEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:10-cr-00042-KDB-DSC-1; 5:16-cv- 00093-KDB)
Submitted: November 18, 2020 Decided: December 14, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Paul Velasquez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anthony Paul Velasquez seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on
his
28 U.S.C. § 2255motion. The order was entered on March 12, 2020, and Velasquez
had 60 days to file his notice of appeal by giving it to prison authorities for mailing. See
Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), (c)(1); Houston v. Lack,
487 U.S. 266, 276(1988). Although
his notice of appeal was dated and received after the 60-day period, Velasquez claimed that
he sent an earlier notice of appeal. However, he did not affirm the date of filing under
penalty of perjury, and the record does not include any earlier notice of appeal or reveal
when or if it was given to prison officials. Accordingly, we remand this case for the limited
purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information and determine whether the
notice of appeal was timely filed under Rule 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as
supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished