Patrick Booker v. Scott Lewis
Patrick Booker v. Scott Lewis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7687
PATRICK L. BOOKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCOTT LEWIS, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution; BART VINCENT, General Counsel for SCDC; JESSICA EDMOND, Mailroom Coordinator of SCDC; CATHERINE AMASON, Postal Director of Kershaw C.I.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (2:17-cv-02165-DCC)
Submitted: October 30, 2020 Decided: December 16, 2020
Before KING, KEENAN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick L. Booker, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Holmes Burton, GIBBES & BURTON, LLC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Patrick L. Booker appeals from the district court’s order adopting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to Defendants in
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983civil rights action and its order granting in part and denying in part
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. * We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Booker v. Lewis, No. 2:17-cv-02165-DCC (D.S.C. May 15 & Oct. 2, 2019).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Booker’s timely appeal of the district court’s May 15, 2019, order—which dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted his claim for a violation of the First Amendment against Defendant Edmond, dismissed with prejudice his claim for a violation of the First Amendment against Defendant Amason, and granted Defendants’ summary judgment motion—and its October 2, 2019, order ruling on his timely Rule 59(e) motion affords this court jurisdiction over the appeal. See Affinity Living Grp., LLC v. StarStone Specialty Ins. Co.,
959 F.3d 634, 639 (4th Cir. 2020); Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC,
959 F.3d 605, 611 (4th Cir. 2020); Campbell v. McCarthy,
952 F.3d 193, 202 n.7 (4th Cir. 2020), petition for cert. filed, No. 20-435 (U.S. Oct. 6, 2020).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished