Lee Gray v. Clarence Steward
Lee Gray v. Clarence Steward
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6891
LEE CLISTER GRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CLARENCE STEWARD; EMILY BROWN; CARRIE WATSON; PATRICIA PAYNE; NURSE LANIER; NURSE BURDICK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard Ernest Myers, II, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03298-M)
Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 21, 2020
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lee Clister Gray, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lee Clister Gray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gray v.
Steward, No. 5:19-ct-03298-M (E.D.N.C. May 21, 2020). We also deny Gray’s motion
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished