Lee Gray v. Clarence Steward
Lee Gray v. Clarence Steward
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6891
LEE CLISTER GRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CLARENCE STEWARD; EMILY BROWN; CARRIE WATSON; PATRICIA PAYNE; NURSE LANIER; NURSE BURDICK, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Richard Ernest Myers, II, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03298-M)
Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 21, 2020
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lee Clister Gray, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Lee Clister Gray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gray v. Steward, No. 5:19-ct-03298-M (E.D.N.C. May 21, 2020). We also deny Gray’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.