In re: Henry Miller
In re: Henry Miller
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1897
In re: HENRY EARL MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-JMC-3)
Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 21, 2020
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our
review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently took significant
action on Miller’s motion. On August 21, 2020, the court instructed the government to file
a response. In September, the government filed a response in opposition and Miller filed
a reply to the Government’s response. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished