U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2020

In re: Henry Miller

In re: Henry Miller
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 21, 2020

In re: Henry Miller

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1897

In re: HENRY EARL MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:04-cr-00022-JMC-3)

Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 21, 2020

Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently took significant action on Miller’s motion. On August 21, 2020, the court instructed the government to file a response. In September, the government filed a response in opposition and Miller filed a reply to the Government’s response. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.