United States v. Rodney Wilson
United States v. Rodney Wilson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7179
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODNEY WILSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-70134-NKM-3)
Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: December 22, 2020
Before THACKER, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Cagle Juhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Rodney Wilson appeals the district court’s order granting Wilson’s counseled
motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to § 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018,
Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132Stat. 5194. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wilson,
No. 4:03-cr-70134-NKM-3 (W.D. Va. July 29, 2020). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court granted Wilson’s motion, the awarded reduction did not reduce his sentence to the full extent sought by Wilson.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished