Savino Braxton v. David Simon
Savino Braxton v. David Simon
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7125
SAVINO BRAXTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID SIMON; EDWARD BURNS; HOME BOX OFFICE, INC., In Their Individual and Official Capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-00094-JKB)
Submitted: December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020
Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Savino Braxton appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Braxton’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Braxton v. Simon, No. 1:20-cv-00094-JKB (D. Md. July 15, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.