Jamal Saunders v. Matthew Roberts
Jamal Saunders v. Matthew Roberts
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-6653
JAMAL KEMO SAUNDERS, a/k/a Forever Al-Mani Hamilton,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MATTHEW ROBERTS, Building Sergeant; HUGHES, Building Lieutenant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:18-cv-00045-NKM-JCH)
Submitted: December 17, 2020 Decided: February 2, 2021
Before KING, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jamal Kemo Saunders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jamal Kemo Saunders appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
to Defendants and dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint without prejudice for failure
to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Saunders v.
Roberts, No. 7:18-cv-00045-NKM-JCH (W.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2020). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished