Tacitus Hall v. Timothy Anderson
Tacitus Hall v. Timothy Anderson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1786
TACITUS ANASTACIUS HALL, a/k/a Tazz Hall,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIMOTHY V. ANDERSON, HUD Commissioner & Anderson Law; WILLIAM I.F. COLLINS; U. S. POSTAL SERVICE; HUD, United States Housing & Urban Development; JAMES MATTHEWS; TRACY THORNE-BEGLAND; JOHN MARSHALL CORPORATE WARD SYSTEMS; CHARLENE WHITE, Circuit Clerk; DENISE HARRIS, Circuit Clerk; ELECTED CIRCUIT CLERK JEWITT; METLIFE HOME LOANS/METLIFE BANK, N.A.; HUD/TSS,LCC; VEPCO, d/b/a Dominion Energy; MANDI LOUPASSI; BETTER HOUSING COALITION; HOMEWARD/CARITAS; RICHMOND FORD LINCOLN, AAA; FORD MANUFACTURER; UNION BANK & TRUST; JOHN ASBURY, CEO; JOHN STALLINGS, President; DMV COMMISSIONERS; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES; KEITH M. YACKO; MCMICHAEL TAYLOR GRAY, LLC; NATIONAL SERVICING CENTER; DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; J. SARGEANT REYNOLDS; VCU; HENRICO & VA COURTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:20-cv-00163-JAG)
Submitted: December 31, 2020 Decided: February 10, 2021
Before KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tacitus Anastacius Hall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Tacitus Anastacius Hall appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Hall v. Anderson, No. 3:20-cv-00163-JAG (E.D. Va.
May 18 & 19, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished