Daniel Gonzalez v. Robert Wilkinson
Daniel Gonzalez v. Robert Wilkinson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1932
DANIEL TRINIDAD GONZALEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: January 28, 2021 Decided: February 11, 2021
Before KING and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel Trinidad Gonzalez, Petitioner Pro Se. Micah S. Engler, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Daniel Trinidad Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the
immigration judge’s (IJ) decision finding him removable as charged. We have thoroughly
reviewed the record, including the transcript and all supporting evidence. We conclude
that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual
findings, see
8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), or that the Board erred in finding that Gonzalez
failed to show that he was prejudiced because the IJ did not offer him the opportunity to
apply for cancellation of removal or other forms of relief from removal. See In re Gonzalez,
(B.I.A. Aug. 19, 2020). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished