Joseph Griffith v. Thomas Maher

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Joseph Griffith v. Thomas Maher

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7342

JOSEPH MICHAEL GRIFFITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THOMAS K. MAHER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03053-BO)

Submitted: February 18, 2021 Decided: February 23, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Michael Griffith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph Michael Griffith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffith v. Maher, No.

5:19-ct-03053 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished