Joseph Griffith v. Thomas Maher
Joseph Griffith v. Thomas Maher
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7342
JOSEPH MICHAEL GRIFFITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THOMAS K. MAHER, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03053-BO)
Submitted: February 18, 2021 Decided: February 23, 2021
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Michael Griffith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Joseph Michael Griffith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Griffith v. Maher, No. 5:19-ct-03053 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 24, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.