In re: Kenneth Reid
In re: Kenneth Reid
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2283
In re: KENNETH ROSHAUN REID,
Petitioner.
On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. (0:04-cr-00353-CMC-1)
Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Roshaun Reid, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Roshaun Reid has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and two
supplements, seeking an order from this court directing the district court to execute the
mandate of this court’s prior judgment, transmitting that judgment to the district court,
ordering that he be released from prison, and ordering that he be transferred to South
Carolina state custody. We conclude that Reid is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct.,
542 U.S. 367, 380(2004); In re Murphy-Brown,
LLC,
907 F.3d 788, 795(4th Cir. 2018). Mandamus relief is available only when the
petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy-Brown,
907 F.3d at 795.
Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp.,
503 F.3d 351, 353(4th Cir. 2007).
The relief sought by Reid is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we
deny the petition for a writ of mandamus as supplemented. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished