Olander Bynum v. Timothy Spencer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Olander Bynum v. Timothy Spencer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7239

OLANDER R. BYNUM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TIMOTHY K. SPENCER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:19-ct-03322-FL)

Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 26, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Olander R. Bynum, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Olander R. Bynum appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action as duplicative and, therefore, frivolous, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e). On appeal,

we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Bynum’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s

disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey,

775 F.3d 170, 177

(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under

Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished