Jarvis Gibbs v. SCDC
Jarvis Gibbs v. SCDC
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7510
JARVIS GIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCDC; BRIAN STIRLING, Director; WARDEN D. STONEBREAKER, Warden; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (0:20-cv-02163-MGL-PJG)
Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 26, 2021
Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jarvis Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Jarvis Gibbs seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to prosecute. Gibbs argued in his notice of appeal, and the record suggests, that he did not receive timely notice of the entry of the district court’s dismissal order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6)(A). Because the 30-day appeal period is jurisdictional, Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007), we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether to reopen the time to file an appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.
REMANDED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.