U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2021

United States v. Daniel O'Brien

United States v. Daniel O'Brien
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 10, 2021

United States v. Daniel O'Brien

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2051

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DANIEL O’BRIEN, Defendant - Appellant, and ELIZABETH O’BRIEN; CITIZENS AND FARMERS BANK, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:18-cv-00396-HEH)

Submitted: March 4, 2021 Decided: March 10, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel O’Brien, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob Earl Christensen, Matthew Steven Johnshoy, Curtis Clarence Pett, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Daniel O’Brien appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his settlement agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. O’Brien, No. 3:18-cv-00396-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 7 & Sept. 4, 2020). We deny O’Brien’s motions for clarification, production of documents, and to strike claims. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.