Metkel Alana v. Officer Rose

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Metkel Alana v. Officer Rose

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6960

METKEL ALANA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICER ROSE, Corrections Officer; TERESA MEADE, Corrections Officer; J. TURNER, Corrections Officer,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of Corrections,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Senior District Judge. (7:18-cv-00420-GEC-PMS)

Submitted: February 22, 2021 Decided: March 22, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Metkel Alana, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Metkel Alana, a Virginia prisoner who filed a

42 U.S.C. § 1983

action against the

Director of the Department of Corrections (“the Director”) and three corrections officers,

appeals the district court’s orders granting the Director’s motion to dismiss and granting

the officers’ summary judgment motion. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Alana v. Rose, No. 7:18-cv-00420-GEC-PMS (W.D. Va. Dec. 20, 2019; June 8, 2020). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished