UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7504

GREGORY HUDSON JONES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY E. RICKMAN, Dentist at Alexander C.I., in his individual and official capacities; TIM F. TOWNSEND, Dentist at Mt. View C.I., in his individual and official capacities; DORA PLUMMER, Director of Health Services at D.P.S., in her individual and official capacities; BELINDA E. ABREU-PENA, Dentist at Alexander C.I., in her individual and official capacities; ERIC HOOKS, Secretary of the D.P.S., in his individual and official capacities; KENNETH LASSITER, Director of Adult Corrections Prisons Division, in his individual and official capacities; PAULA SMITH, Director of Health Care Services, in her individual and official capacities; JAMES CLARE, Dental Director, in his individual and official capacities; DONNA L. WOODRUFF, DDS, Assistant Dental Director, in her individual and official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JAMES VAUGHN,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (5:18-cv-00181-MR)

Submitted: March 18, 2021 Decided: March 22, 2021 Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Hudson Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Jones, CARRUTHERS & ROTH, PA, Greensboro, North Carolina; Stephen W. Coles, COLES LAW FIRM, Concord, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Gregory Hudson Jones appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants

summary judgment in Jones’

action. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Jones v. Rickman, No. 5:18-cv-00181-MR (W.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2020). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3