April Ledford v. Eastern Band of Cherokee
April Ledford v. Eastern Band of Cherokee
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-2232
APRIL LEDFORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-00005-MR)
Submitted: April 22, 2021 Decided: April 26, 2021
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirm as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
April Ledford, Appellant Pro Se. Dale Allen Curriden, Nevin Wisnoski, VAN WINKLE LAW FIRM, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: April Ledford appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court correctly found that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Ledford’s complaint.
However, as the dismissal was based on the lack of subject matter jurisdiction, it “must be one without prejudice, because a court that lacks jurisdiction has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits.” S. Walk at Broadlands Homeowner’s Ass’n, Inc. v. OpenBand at Broadlands, LLC, 713 F.3d 175, 185 (4th Cir. 2013). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing Ledford’s complaint, but we modify the judgment to reflect that Ledford’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.