United States v. Ernest Dailey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ernest Dailey

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6146

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ERNEST DAILEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:14-cr-00072-BO-1)

Submitted: April 27, 2021 Decided: May 3, 2021

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernest Dailey, Appellant Pro Se. Asia Jamar Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ernest Dailey appeals the district court’s order denying his postconviction motion

to amend his presentence report. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dailey,

No. 7:14-cr-00072-BO-1 (E.D.N.C filed Jan. 7, 2021 & entered Jan. 8, 2021). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished