United States v. Michael Jacobs
United States v. Michael Jacobs
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7728
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL JACOBS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00364-D-1)
Submitted: April 27, 2021 Decided: May 5, 2021
Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua L. Rogers, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
In this motion for compassionate release brought by Michael Jacobs, the district
court entered an order denying the motion without prejudice for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies. Jacobs noted his appeal from the order dismissing his motion
without prejudice and, on appeal, sought consideration of his motion on the merits.
However, subsequently, the district court granted Jacobs reconsideration, assumed that
administrative remedies were exhausted, and denied the motion on the merits. Because
Jacobs has already received the relief he seeks on appeal, this appeal is now moot. See
Incumaa v. Ozmint,
507 F. 3d 281, 286(4th Cir. 2007) (setting forth principles of appellate
mootness). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished