U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2021

United States v. Michael Jacobs

United States v. Michael Jacobs
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 5, 2021

United States v. Michael Jacobs

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7728

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL JACOBS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00364-D-1)

Submitted: April 27, 2021 Decided: May 5, 2021

Before AGEE, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua L. Rogers, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: In this motion for compassionate release brought by Michael Jacobs, the district court entered an order denying the motion without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Jacobs noted his appeal from the order dismissing his motion without prejudice and, on appeal, sought consideration of his motion on the merits.

However, subsequently, the district court granted Jacobs reconsideration, assumed that administrative remedies were exhausted, and denied the motion on the merits. Because Jacobs has already received the relief he seeks on appeal, this appeal is now moot. See Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F. 3d 281, 286 (4th Cir. 2007) (setting forth principles of appellate mootness). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.