United States v. Ernest McNeill, III
United States v. Ernest McNeill, III
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-7612
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERNEST CHARLES MCNEILL, III, a/k/a Scooter,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:10-cr-00241-D-1)
Submitted: April 30, 2021 Decided: May 7, 2021
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ernest Charles McNeill, III, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua L. Rogers, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ernest Charles McNeill, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First Step
Act of 2018,
Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1),
132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the
record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying McNeill’s
motion. See United States v. Kibble,
992 F.3d 326, 329(4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard
of review). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. McNeill, No. 5:10-cr-00241-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2020). We deny McNeill’s
motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished